| Main |

As you can see, the performance is very good. And by the way, Windows is running inside a virtual machine (VMWare Fusion).

And no, Visual Studio is not pre-loaded into memory. The startup was initialized right after the machine was booted.

Tuesday, March 03, 2009 11:20:28 AM (W. Europe Standard Time, UTC+01:00) 
  Permalink  |  Comments [4]  |  View blog reactions  | 
Tuesday, March 10, 2009 9:26:30 AM (W. Europe Standard Time, UTC+01:00)
Impressive, especially when it's running inside VMware. You should try VirtualBox from Sun. I've been using it for month now, on vista x64 and it's fast and reliable.
Wednesday, March 11, 2009 11:00:23 AM (W. Europe Standard Time, UTC+01:00)
Hi, and thanks!:)

I’m really satisfied with Fusion, it seems stable and it’s fast.

Thanks for the tip regarding VirtualBox. I’ve heard that’s a really good virtual machine as well, and I should absolutely take it for a test ride. Which disk format does it support?

My main concern about VirtualPCs nowadays is that they have their own proprietary disk format, which gives us lots of friction when we want to move virtual computers between virtualization platforms.
Wednesday, March 18, 2009 7:03:02 PM (W. Europe Standard Time, UTC+01:00)
What hardware is this? I'm having trouble finding (deciding) on what laptop to go for, for my new development environment.
Steve
Thursday, March 19, 2009 10:07:59 AM (W. Europe Standard Time, UTC+01:00)
@Steve

The hardware I’m using is a Macbook Aluminum 2,4 GHz, 4GB memory and a Intel X25 SSD Disk. You can read more about my setup here; http://blog.goeran.no/PermaLink,guid,18f93215-1129-458f-91d9-fbb4ce41f1ee.aspx

I’m really satisfied with this setup and I give it my highest recommendations. The Macbook is noticeable faster than my iMac (2,8 GHz, 4GB memory and a 500GB 7200 rpm disk). It’s the best laptop I’ve ever bought, period.

Name
E-mail
(will show your gravatar icon)
Home page

Comment (HTML not allowed)  

Enter the code shown (prevents robots):